Services · Digital Forensics

Evidence that survives being challenged.

Computer, mobile, and cloud forensics with defensible chain of custody.

What this covers

Evidence collection: Write-blocked acquisition from computer, mobile and cloud sources, hashed at source and verified on arrival.
Data extraction: Recovery from deleted, damaged and encrypted sources wherever lawful access to them exists.
Evidence analysis: Analysis performed only against a working copy, so the original stays provably untouched.
Timeline analysis: Events reconstructed across devices and logs into one sequence, with every clock reconciled to a single reference.
Malware analysis: Static and behavioural examination to establish what ran, when it ran, and what it was able to reach.
Reporting and admissibility: Written for counsel and for a court, with the method stated plainly so it can be repeated and challenged.

How the work runs

Digital Forensics, end to end.

Evidence is only useful if it survives being challenged. Everything below is built around that one requirement, starting before the first byte is read.

Preserve first
Write-blocked acquisition, custody documented from the moment we take possession. The most common way an investigation is lost is somebody helpfully looking at the machine first.
OutputChain of custody, opened
Acquire and hash
A forensic image, hashed on acquisition and verified against that hash at every later step. All analysis runs on the copy; the original is sealed and never touched again.
OutputVerified image with hash record
Analyse
Filesystem artefacts, deleted and slack space, registry and log remnants, malware where present. What was done, by which account, using what.
OutputArtefact findings
Build the timeline
Events from every source correlated onto one clock, with the sequence evidenced rather than asserted. A reconstruction whose order cannot be shown is not admissible.
OutputCorrelated timeline
Report to a standard that holds
Written for a reader who may be hostile: method stated, tools and versions named, every conclusion traceable to the artefact it rests on, and the limits said out loud.
OutputExpert report, defensible